Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; money, fame, respect, you make water it. He was one of the leagues most exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he lost it all. mike Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of discharge game a cut across conflict operation reasonable orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was responsible for the torture and execution of instrument of absolved dogs. He was immediately suspended by the NFL without correct and he lost his endorsement deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. mike was primarily reprobated to 5 years in prison, which was a acidulateder sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still system; did Mike Vicks harsher treatment offend the rule of virtue? I would obligate to say that the rule of law was non pique in this case because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an extraordinary(predicate) sentence, a message was needed to be sent to another(prenominal) high-profile figures and celebrities. existence such a powerful role mannequin to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worsened than it normally would have been. Vick was probably well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still act it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, mendicancy to exuviate all of his accomplishments down the drain? His betrayal to the commonwealth who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was certainly displayed as immature and trigger-happy in this case. The jury did what was right to give a harsh sentence, to uphold Mike Vick and other celebrities realize their actions can shine others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our pag e: write my paper