Case Study: Lakes Automotive Essay

1. How do companies combine mannerologies? reaction Companies combine methodologies by conducting research to determine the fastest and most cost effective method to move product and gratify the customer criticizing both advantages and disadvantages asking for the opinions of the employees and managers, and/or deciding which phase the club is giveing to keep.2. How do you get employees to interchange work habits that demand proven to be successful? settle In place to get employees to change work habits that score been proven to be successful, centering must ensure that the hot, implemented work habits are on the dot as skilful and will benefit the overall longevity of the comp either as well as the employees of the attach to.3. What influence should a customer pee in redesigning a methodological analysis that has proven to be successful? resolve The customer should energise a lot of influence in redesigning a methodology that has proven to be successful because the overall goal of any company should be to encounter the customer. The customer is essential in generating the companys revenue.4. What if the customers want the existing methodologies left intact? solution If the customers of both companies, Lakes Automotive and Pelex Automotive Products, desire to implement the existing methodologies than the board will have to agree on a standard methodology to satisfy both parties. Therefore, combining methodologies becomes a vital option.5. What if the customers are unhappy with the bare-assed feature methodology? Answer If the customers are unhappy with the unfermented combined methodology than management should revisit the most effective way to satisfy the majority of the customer base.1. wherefore was it so difficult to develop a methodology?Answer It was difficult because the employees were not trained and was not conditioned on the one particular methodology.2. Why were all three sign methodology based on policies and procedure? Answ er The three initial methodologies were based on policies and procedure, because that was the only standard that information systems, new products, and new corporate clients have in common. It was used because everyone is aware of policies and procedures and have approach path to references.3. Why do you believe the organization later was willing to aim a singular methodology? Answer It is not possible for on that point to be any organization or success in doing agate line with using three different methodologies. It had to be chaotic. Moreover, the company had a fuss deciding how to assign the right run across manager to the right fancy. (Kerzner, pg. 5)4. Why was he singular methodology based on guidelines rather than policies and procedures? Answer In the beginning the company used policies and procedures as a mapping for the three initial methodologies it was using, because they probably thought that was a way to have some sort of organization amongst the three methodolo gies. Later when the company realized the scheme was not working, they decided to use one methodology. Furthermore, since everyone is trained in the only methodology the company is now using it made signified for everyone to follow the guidelines of the methodology instead of the policy and procedure.5. Did it make comprehend to have the fourth day of the training program devoted to the methodology and flat attached to the end of the three-day program? Answer Yes, it certainly made sense to have the fourth day devoted to training the employee on the new methodology. It is important for the employee to learn the new methodology specially since the previous strategy of using three different methodologies did not work for the company. In order for a company to be successfully all the employees should be trained, practice, and be comfortable with the companys culture and methodology. According to the PMBOK Guide, a methodology is defined as, A system of practices, techniques, proce dures, and rules used by those whowork in a discipline, therefore a company will have a difficult time being successful if everyone doesnt know the methodology the company practices.6. Why was the consultant not allowed to teach the methodology? Answer The consultant was brought in only to train employees on scheme management skills, therefore, as the text implies, the consultants expertise is only in that subject. Moreover, the new methodology was developed internally. Since it was created internally only an internal employee could have the knowledge to train employees on the new methodology.1. What is the critical issue?Answer The critical issue is that the Clark Faucet Company has a non-cooperative culture therefore, the engine room and marketing department is not encouraged to communicate. This causes friction between the twain departments and many failed project management implementations.2. What can be done intimately it?Answer The executive director council should enforc e better company structure. For example, good project management practices and mandate communication between the engineering and marketing departments in order to complete task effectively and efficiently.3. Can excellence in project management palliate be achieved and, if so, how? What step can you propose? Answer Excellence in project management may still be achieved if the project manager follows the tasks identified under the planning, execution, and closing. I would suggest the project manager keep constant communication with the stakeholder to identify put on the line (issues) internally and externally that will prevent the project form progressing.4. minded(p) the current non-cooperative culture, how long will it take to achieve a good cooperative project management culture, and even excellence? Answer The space in changing the project management culture depends on the executive decisions and implementation process. If all employees are madeaware of change and consequen ces of not adapting to change than the culture should transition quickly. However, if its not encouraged or skillful than a culture transition may take a charm to achieve.7. Should a singular methodology for project management have a process for the prioritization of projects or should some committee external to the methodology effectuate this? Answer There should be a singular methodology for project management to have a process for the prioritization of projects because as a project manager, you are responsible for the planning, execution, and closing of the project. Therefore, the prioritization move under the planning phase, which falls under the project manager.