case study :: essays research papers

Philosophy 324Case 9Is a good lawyer just considered good if they keep their confidences with their clients and shape up their cases? Or is their more to a good lawyer? I withdraw there should be much more. Lawyers should be obligated to doing the morally remunerate action even if it means losing the case. This is what the moral element concept suggests. Considering this concept, we whitethorn no longer believe that a good lawyer is but an useful legal advocate. Rather, a good attorney should be effective morally, as well as representing his clients cause. It is because of this that one cannot desist that a good attorney is one who just pass ons cases. A lawyer is not just a good legal advocate. An attorney essential conduct himself in the behavior of a morally good person and practice desirable character traits. I believe that the moral means concept is the ethical way to conduct yourself as a lawyer. I will defend my thesis by offering reasons for my define, including moral theories, objections to my position using moral theories, and responses to the objections which are stated.My first reason that the moral operator concept is ethical is there is a point when the moral agent will not worry about winning the case because to win the case would involve unethical actions. This reason is backed up by the moral theory deontology. The moral agent treats others as ends in themselves and not as mere means to winning cases. For example, a defendant in a murder trial confesses to his attorney that he is indeed guilt-ridden of the crime. The moral agent would not allow for this case to continue. The attorney would cut across to the authorities that his client is guilty. If the lawyer did not report this to the authorities and continue to represent his client, he would be treating the victim and the victims family as mere means to winning the case. Doing this would be unethical. Someone might point using deontology that in a circumstance where the lawye r reports his client subsequently he admits to the murder, the lawyer is betraying his clients trust and treating his client as means. A lawyer cannot swear to his client that everything, including unethical information, will remain confidential if he is going to end up telling on his client. Nobody would hire attorneys if they reported privileged information to the authorities.