Democracy vs Dictatorship Essay

tyranny and commonwealth atomic number 18 two concepts with numerous views and differences. The first is non rarified for a society which seeks put down press, human rights and equality. The second is, even though many a(prenominal) facets cause to be taken into account. Throughout history, scholars have put out a range of arguments escorting the advantages and disadvantages of both systems in terms of ontogeny. Here, we go out try to enumerate some of them.An high-and-mighty government is a socio-economic class of government in which the power is centralized (single person or a group). absolutism have discoverd in many countries and region of the adult male for years Latin America, Africa, Caribbean and Asia (especi onlyy the Middle East). In all cases, it was not all evil, where genocide, assassination or corruption were common like with Saddam Hussein. Scholars hold that some countries have seen a boost in socioeconomic development downstairs dictator governmen ts. It was the case for Dominican Republic under Trujillo, genus Argentina in the 60s, Chile in the 70s under Pinochet, Singapore or Turkey. For these leaders, their countries were not ready for democracy because dictatorial governments could weaken impose rational, long-term development plans (Handelman, 2011, 35). The father of Singapores authoritarian political system, Lee Kuan Yew, declared that discipline is more essential for a developed country than democracy.Lee also stated that commonwealth leads to undiscipline and disorderly conduct, which are inimical to development (Handelman, 2011, 35). His strong statement was somewhat carried out by many LDCs around the globe, especially in Africa where ethnic issues are common. In a totalism, there are no riots against the government or its affiliates, a single society is more in all probability in power, the ruler has unlimited power, plans are executed efficiently and in a fashion manner, most efficient during emergencies, and less(prenominal) room for corruption. Dictatorship also promotes obedience to the ruler, strict discipline is a MUST. There are also some advantages for an authoritarian government.The negative side of a dictatorship relates to absence of bounteousdom of speech (the hatful has no say in how the system works, follow the leader blindly), no fair elections, oppression of community or member of the opposition, power to a small group, no rise up-bred rights (violation of human rights), poor governance, lack mixer welfare, social inequalities and the gap betwixt sizeable and poor is very significant. Also, when it comes to ruthless dictatorship like Syria, atrocities and pass out of war prevail. In short, dictatorship does not agree with international stop and even advocates of authoritarian governments admitted that most dictatorships have caused great damage to many countries education, economy and infrastructure systems (Handelman, 2011, 35). Dictatorship can be a commit for a countrys socioeconomic development.Democracy is the promotion of fairness, social equality, transparency, freedom and speech. Today, it is perceived the best form of government. A full exposition from our book (Handelman, 2011, 31) pointed out that democracy is obvious whenmost of the countrys leading government officials are elected there is universal or near universal suffrage elections are largely free of player and outside manipulation opposition-party candidates have a realistic chance of macrocosm elected to important national offices and civil libertiesincluding minority rightsare respected, with guarantees of free speech, free assembly, free press (media), and freedom of religion.Others define it in regard to fair election and governance. A democratic government will micturate sure that its people grasp the importance of its policies, promote fundamental rights and computer backup a stronger middle class (Handelman, 2011, 30). Unlike dictatorship, a democracy doe s not use fear or force to govern its people. It is a free society where the civil society is empowered not weakened and where the rule of law prevail, not the rule of a person or a group (Geddes, 2004, 5). History has shown that most industrialize countries are democratic, perhaps because industrialisation leads to increases in wealth, education, communication and equality (Handelman, 2011, 30). However, like dictatorship, democracy has some shortcomings.Scholars underlined that democracy can be as bad as dictatorship unstable, promotes party interest and it can also be a waste of measure and resources (enacting laws like the ban on gun currently for example). Revolt is less likely to happen in a free society because the people elected their representatives via fair elections. Some critics emphasized that democracy will not be efficient in the LDCs if these states do not have a literacy rate of at least 50% as well as a socioeconomic modernization, which would narrow the gap betwe en rich and the middle class (Handelman 2011, 34). Other critics insisted on the fact that democracy boost corruption, and industrialization/globalization are western strategies to better exploit threesome World countries (Handelman, 2011, 30).The paragraphs above showed several advantages of having a democratic society than an authoritarian one. They also have similarities and in some circumstances, they have to work together. Democracy is ideal because it promotes an equal society where everyone has a fair shot at success. Dictatorship does not. Thus, it might be fair to say that it is better for a society to experience another type of government (like a single-party) to unite a democratic development.