Social and Individual Responsibility in Frankenstein :: Social Responsibility in Frankenstein

Social and Individual Responsibility in Frankenstein Mary Shelly wrote Frankenstein in a time of wonder. A main wonder was whether you could put lifetime back into the all of a sudden. Close to the topic of bringing life back into the dead was whether you could ready your own being, like selective breeding save a bit more powerful. Close to where Mary lived there was a troops named Vultair was experimenting putting electricity through Frogs to see if they could come back to life. With that liberation on close to her as well as the fear of a revolution and the pressure on her to think of a ghost theme it is not surprising she thought of a horror story that would ease be popular in the 21st Century. Now I stimulate explained where the story came from and why it is as it is I will explain the kindly responsibility it brings up and how it is still important today. Looking later on something you create is one point it brings up. Frankenstein created his creature so he shou ld have looked after it but instead just because he didnt like the way it looked he ran away. He never taught his creature anything so for all the creature knew it could have been okay to kill people and suchlike. That relates to today as some children who were not taught right from wrong by their parents watch films like Scream and I know what you did last summer where murdering seems cool as it involves Jennifer Love Hewit, Sarah Michelle Geller and Neve Cambell acquire killed. The children watch these and think I want to be like that alarming guy with the mask and they go and try to kill someone. If they do they come charged for the offence but many people think that the childrens parents should be blamed as they never taught the child right from wrong and they didnt peak the child (sometimes as young as eight or nine) from ceremony the video which is rated eighteen or fifteen. When the filmmakers hear about how their film was responsible for(p) for a death they never (exce pt for once) take the film away from the macrocosm and what they usually do is make a less violent sequel, which isnt sincerely helping anyone and less violence still is some violence. Teaching a child right from wrong is another point it brings up but I feel I have covered this point in the section above.