Proof reading Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Proof reading - Essay Examplehe council planned to be charging rung for lay in other to encourage them to use public transport, which they thought would be more cost effective. The council also wanted to measure any changes in demeanor that occurred as a result of the campaign that was planned for this autumn.The results from the sample were analysed by gender. Just 6% of males travelled to train by bicycle and 9% of females did the same. The results for males and females were outstandingly close but were non representing. Furthermore, 20% of male staff use the bus to get to work while 14% of female staff used the same mode of transportation according to this survey, more males use bus to get to work than female staff. It is amusing to know that 17% of male staff use the car car to get to work while 16% of females use the same mode of transportation too. Analysing the results for both male and female reveals no difference between the car users, and the results suggested that th e respondent preferred to use this mode of transportation more than any other mode. 3% of male staff traveled to work on a motorcycle while there is no single female in the survey that used this mode of transportation. It could be that it is not a preferred mode of transportation for female respondents. 20% of males use trains compared to 24% of females that use the train as a mode of transportation. The underground is all the same more popular with females as 26% use this mode while only 21% male in the survey. 16% of males preferred to walk to work and 9% of females also preferred walking.The mean amount of sentence it takes Camdington Council staff, based on the results of the survey, was 34 minutes to travel to work for males and the same amount of time for female staff members. The standard deviation was 19 minutes for males, which was an equal time for females at 19 minutes. The (Coefficient of variation for males was 56% and 58% for females). These figures showed that there was no bias, even though the respondents were